Evaluating risk in commercial real estate works best with a simple, repeatable framework. Every asset carries a distinct risk profile shaped by market dynamics, asset attributes, capital structure, and operational execution. Treat risk as a moving system, not a static checklist; inputs shift with cycles, policy, and tenant behavior. A disciplined approach clarifies which risks are compensated and which are not—and helps teams structure deals that endure.
Core risk framework
Risk in CRE consolidates into four buckets: market, asset, financial, and operational. Market risk includes employment and output trends, new supply pipelines, absorption, and cap rate movements. Asset risk covers location quality, tenant concentration, lease rollover, physical condition, and functional obsolescence. Financial risk comes from leverage choices, interest-rate exposure, debt covenants, and maturity walls. Operational risk tests the feasibility of the plan: management intensity, capex, and timelines.
Start with clean data and calibrated scenarios. Verify rent rolls, operating statements, and third‑party reports. Build base, downside, and severe cases, then pressure‑test the few assumptions that swing returns: rent growth, downtime, exit cap, and stabilization timing. Quantify impacts on cash flow, DSCR, and equity returns to decide where structure should absorb volatility—through lower leverage, interest rate hedges, or reserve sizing.
We tailor our approach to your needs and guide you through the best decisions. Contact Agora Real Estate Group today.
Industrial: Freight demand meets supply waves
Secular demand for industrial property is driven primarily by e-commerce, on-shoring and modern logistics, but supply often reacts quickly (especially if land is cheap and entitlement processes are streamlined).
New speculative deliveries can boost vacancy rates by several percentage points, and significantly change the landlord’s competitive position in a matter of weeks or months. Therefore, when selecting a market to invest in industrial property, logistics nodes, proximity to ports, intermodal connectivity and the depth of the labor pool are much better indicators of future demand than broad metropolitan area averages.
As vacancy increases, building specifications emerge as the primary determinants of competitiveness. Clear height, dock and door counts, trailer and car parking ratios, ESFR sprinkler systems, and power supply availability are often the primary criteria that tenants use to evaluate whether to shortlist a facility for consideration.
Functional obsolescence can develop rapidly in this sector. ‘Good bones’ today can become obsolete tomorrow if they are judged against evolving standards for clear height, bay spacing, truck courts, etc.
Financial structure deserves equal scrutiny. Long leases with steady bump schedules can protect downside but may cap upside in rapidly appreciating submarkets. Conversely, short terms preserve mark‑to‑market potential but elevate rollover risk. Interest‑rate hedging and covenant headroom matter when absorption slows. Operationally, tenant credit quality, maintenance programs, and capex for yard improvements or dock upgrades can be decisive in competitive lease negotiations.
You can also read: How to position industrial assets for long-term value in Miami}
Office: Cash flow fragility and relevance risk
Assets in the office sector have a higher-than-average future secular and cyclical risk. With the shifts caused by hybrid work, overall demand for space has decreased. The leases for getting buildings operational post-lease up have lengthened. There is an increasing divide between properties with improved operating efficiency and buildings that are considered commodities.
Additionally, many elements such as amenities, ESG performance, wellness features, commute patterns, and sublease inventories all play a critical role in determining the value of the property and can distort the effective rental comparables and extend the vacancies of a property. When underwriting, it must be assumed that there will be increased downtime in the future as well as the need for higher levels of tenant improvements and leasing commissions. Primarily for assets in the mid-tier range.
The availability of financing will be more restricted and thus increase refinance risk and significantly influence DSCR and interest-only periods. On the other hand, a thorough understanding of lease expiration, tenant credit, and exposure to concentrated industries will provide insight into the cash flow volatility.
Sensitivity to issues that relate to exit cap rates, renewal probabilities, TI/LC expenditures, and Loan-to-Value (LTV) will all be important considerations. As a result, all capital plans must factor in the need for obsolescence. Accordingly, upgrading the lobbies, elevators, ventilation systems, and energy performance of a building may help reposition the asset.
However, large reserves and detailed phasing will be required to minimize the impact of such renovations on current tenants.
Partner with Agora and get the best results. Contact us today.
Pulling it together: Sensitivity first, structure second
Let the sensitivity analysis guide structure. Identify which variables most influence returns and counter them with practical levers: adjust leverage, extend or stagger lease terms, use interest‑rate caps, or size reserves to cover peak cash needs. Prefer business plans that remain viable across realistic adverse scenarios rather than those that require perfect execution. A clear framework won’t eliminate risk, but it will spotlight risks worth taking and those that deserve a wider margin of safety.
If you found our article useful, please share it with others and don’t forget to follow us on Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn as well as check out our services at agorare.com